I wanted a girl to balance out my kids, so was slightly bummed. I believe it was 3 or 4 days later and I got the results in my e-mail. Quite frankly, it was a messy and stressful affair. My counter and hand were covered in blood after. So I had to forego getting a clock or phone and just guesstimate which was way more stress than I intended. So after locking myself in the bathroom afraid to contaminate anything, I read I need a clock or timer because the blood needs to be collected in a certain timeframe. Here’s the part that annoyed me the most: the directions are in the sealed and sterile box.

I took a shower to remove any DNA and took the test naked to avoid contamination from clothes. I waited until my sons were asleep and bleached the entire bathroom. I read that you need to sterilize everything before doing the Sneak Peek test and to not have any males around to avoid contamination. I ordered the Sneak Peek test around 8 weeks and took it when I turned 9 weeks. The SneakPeek class action lawsuit asserts violations of the California Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, fraud, breach of express warranty, and unjust enrichment, among other claims.ĭue to a deadline extension that was granted by the court, SneakPeek now has until April 1 to file a response to the Early Gender Test class action lawsuit.Just wanted to give my experience if any moms are looking into either of these tests to check for gender before their 20 week ultrasound. They found that the test was only about 60 percent accurate.īy filing the gender identification kit class action lawsuit, Main seeks to represent a Class of all consumers in the United States who purchased the SneakPeek Early Gender Test. One reviewer states that a group of women participating in a forum decided to take the SneakPeek test and compare the results to the actual gender of their babies after they were born. She points to a number of online complaints from users who received inaccurate results from the gender identification test. Main alleges SneakPeek is aware of the inaccuracies of its Early Gender Test. “The results are not 99 percent accurate but much closer to a flip of a coin.” “Plaintiff is not the only person to rely on SneakPeek’s 99 percent accuracy claim and pay Defendants money for a product that is not anywhere near as accurate as promised,” the SneakPeek class action lawsuit alleges.

9, 2015, Main received an email from SneakPeek that said, “Congratulations You are having a baby girl!” However, the SneakPeek class action lawsuit states that Main gave birth to a baby boy in July 2015. According to the SneakPeek class action lawsuit, Main was 14 weeks pregnant when she took the test. Main states that she did not want to wait until her sonogram to know the gender of her unborn baby, so she was willing to pay $169 for the SneakPeek Early Gender Test. “ claims its test utilizes the natural process of shared fetal circulating DNA in the mother and from a drop of blood can determine the baby’s gender as early as nine weeks into a pregnancy,” the SneakPeek Early Gender Test class action lawsuit says.Īccording to the SneakPeek class action lawsuit, the fetal gender identification kit is advertised as containing everything needed to collect a sample, which will be processed by its “state of the art lab.” SneakPeek promises to deliver the test results within 24 hours of receiving the sample. She says she purchased the SneakPeek Early Gender Test in February 2015 due to SneakPeek’s representations that the test was 99 percent accurate in determining the gender of a baby, and that the gender determination could be made earlier than a sonogram. The SneakPeek class action lawsuit was filed by plaintiff Kristine Main in December 2015.

Sneak peek gender test wrong 2020